imago dei (post 4 of 5)
In the last few posts I have discussed some common interpretations of the “image of God.” I have explained why I think the interpretations based on human capacities or our relationships to God are not compatible with scripture, logic, or the character of Christ in us. Today I want to look at what it means to understand the “image of God” as our God given role, function, and task.
In the last few posts I have discussed some common interpretations of the “image of God.” I have explained why I think the interpretations based on human capacities or our relationships to God are not compatible with scripture, logic, or the character of Christ in us. Today I want to look at what it means to understand the “image of God” as our God given role, function, and task.
To best understand why the original intended audience of the
book of Genesis would have interpreted the imago
dei in this light I encourage you to read “The Lost World of Genesis One”
by John Walton. He explains how the worldviews of Ancient Near Eastern cultures
would have made sense of this text. Hint – It has little to do with
science. If you are interested here is a review of the book I wrote a while back.
In Walton’s book
one of the points he argues is that Genesis One is the story of God
establishing his dwelling place (temple) in our cosmos. In the construction of
a temple the image of the god represented (an icon) was one of the last things put
in before the temple could become functional. Humanity has the role of
accurately representing God within his temple.
As image bearers we
have the task, role, and function of reflecting God's image to humanity and
creation.
N.T. Wright uses
the wonderful example of an angled mirror to explain our role. An angled mirror
does not reflect your image back at you, but the image proportionally opposite
to where you are standing. As image bearers we function like a tilted
mirror. As we angle ourselves toward God his image is better reflected out
toward the rest of creation.
I closest align
with this dynamic view because I believe the image God is something we bear as
well as do our best to work toward. The imageo
dei is not simply something we are but something we become. It is a role we
are designed to play and it should drive us toward action.
Of course we fail
to accurately reflect God’s image in all his glory. At best the image we
present to creation is a distorted version of who God is. But the good news is when
we find the paradigm for his image in Jesus we receive a clear vision for how
our lives should reflect God.
In our every thought and action we should ask ourselves these
questions. Does this help me better fulfill my role as an image bearer? Will I better reflect who God is to all of creation
through this?

No comments:
Post a Comment